5 ms·
It's a little more complicated than that. First, the job was more painful than expected. Second, they lied to him about starting salaries, telling him that al
by wccrawford 14y ago
It's a little more complicated than that. First, the job was more painful than expected. Second, they lied to him about starting salaries, telling him that all new employees in that position started at the rate he got. Then they hired another employee into that position for higher, just weeks later.
And finally, you have to ask for things to get them. If he just quit without asking, he'd never know if he could have gotten that raise instead. Now, he knows. At a different company, he might actually have gotten it.
I think he made exactly the right decision at each step, given the knowledge he had at that point.
Personally, I probably would have chosen to stick it out at that company until I found that second job, instead of quitting on the spot, but that's me. But the end result wouldn't be that different.
- huggyface 14y agoSounds like he wants union work, then, with the benefits (such as complete wage transparency and information clarify) but also the detriments (lobsters in a pot pulling each other down, impossible to exceed the boundaries of a position). I don't want union work. When I hear people whine and bitch because they think they're worth as much as other employees...I don't know but it really makes me dislike them. I despise that mentality. Someone else negotiated better than you -- suck it up, crybaby.
- franticpedantic 14y agoHe learned new market information, negotiated the cost of his services (not re-negging because it's at-will employment), and when he couldn't strike a deal, he did so with another party. This is the free-market at work, while you are going on a non-sequitur political rant that doesn't make any sense since what he did is pretty much the opposite of unionizing.
- huggyface 14y agoPolitical rant? The piece is at its core a whiny complaint, complaining of grievous injustice. That you try to explain it away as simple market forces is truly laughable. Yes, the attitude expressed in the piece is the foundation of unionization.
- danielweber 14y agoIf the problem was that he wasn't as good as the other employee, the boss could say that. (The boss could say it even if it wasn't true.) The boss pretends on one hand to be locked in by bureaucracy when he doesn't want to do something, but they aren't really stopping him. Anyway, it seems he is negotiating a better salary. The boss refused to deal so he walked. Good.
- lolcraft 14y agoHe didn't "whine and bitch". He quit.