3 ms·

Well this was my experience... User: Hey, how are you? Llama: [object Object] It's funny but I don't think I did anything wrong?

by kaoD 2y ago

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
AlienRobot 2y ago
2000: Javascript is webpages. 2010: Javascript is webservers. 2020: Javascript is desktop applications. 2024: Javascript is AI.
- evbogue 2y ago
  From this data we must conclude that within our lifetimes all matter in the universe will eventually be reprogrammed in JavaScript.
  - mnky9800n 2y ago
    I'm not sure I want to live in that reality.
    - mortenjorck 2y ago
      If the simulation hypothesis is real, perhaps it would follow that all the dark matter and dark energy in the universe is really just extra cycles being burned on layers of interpreters and JIT compilation of a loosely-typed scripting language.
    - AlienRobot 2y ago
      It's fine, it will be Typescript.
    - anotherjesse 2y ago
      WAT? https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
    - heresie-dabord 2y ago
      ... a reality where everything in software development that was previously established as robust foundation is discarded, only to be re-learned and re-implemented less well while burning VC cash.
Jedd 2y ago
Often you'll find there's '-chat-' and '-instruct-' variants of an LLM available. Trying to chat to an INSTRUCT model will be disappointing, much as you describe.
- kaoD 2y ago
  This was on their example LLaVA 1.5 7b q4 with all default parameters which does not specify chat or instruct... but after the first message it actually worked as expected so I guess it's RLHF'd for chat or chat+instruct. I don't know if it was some sort of error on the UI or what. Trying to interrogate it about the first message yielded no results. It just repeated back my question, verbatim, unlike the rest of the chat which was more or less chat-like :shrugh:

3 ms·

Well this was my experience... User: Hey, how are you? Llama: [object Object] It's funny but I don't think I did anything wrong?

by kaoD 2y ago

Well this was my experience... User: Hey, how are you? Llama: [object Object] It's funny but I don't think I did anything wrong?

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
AlienRobot 2y ago
2000: Javascript is webpages. 2010: Javascript is webservers. 2020: Javascript is desktop applications. 2024: Javascript is AI.
- evbogue 2y ago
  From this data we must conclude that within our lifetimes all matter in the universe will eventually be reprogrammed in JavaScript.
  - mnky9800n 2y ago
    I'm not sure I want to live in that reality.
    - mortenjorck 2y ago
      If the simulation hypothesis is real, perhaps it would follow that all the dark matter and dark energy in the universe is really just extra cycles being burned on layers of interpreters and JIT compilation of a loosely-typed scripting language.
    - AlienRobot 2y ago
      It's fine, it will be Typescript.
    - anotherjesse 2y ago
      WAT? https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
    - heresie-dabord 2y ago
      ... a reality where everything in software development that was previously established as robust foundation is discarded, only to be re-learned and re-implemented less well while burning VC cash.
Jedd 2y ago
Often you'll find there's '-chat-' and '-instruct-' variants of an LLM available. Trying to chat to an INSTRUCT model will be disappointing, much as you describe.
- kaoD 2y ago
  This was on their example LLaVA 1.5 7b q4 with all default parameters which does not specify chat or instruct... but after the first message it actually worked as expected so I guess it's RLHF'd for chat or chat+instruct. I don't know if it was some sort of error on the UI or what. Trying to interrogate it about the first message yielded no results. It just repeated back my question, verbatim, unlike the rest of the chat which was more or less chat-like :shrugh: