4 ms·
> prohibits online platforms from knowingly providing an addictive feed to a minor without parental consent totally onboard with the concept; but what is the b
by insane_dreamer 2y ago
> prohibits online platforms from knowingly providing an addictive feed to a minor without parental consent
totally onboard with the concept; but what is the burden of proof that a feed is "addictive"? If it falls on the state, then this probably won't have much effect (other than maybe to scare tech companies to be a bit more careful, which is maybe the best we can hope for)
- ethbr1 2y ago> what is the burden of proof that a feed is "addictive"? Daily use growing? So basically social media companies' KPIs.
- lovecg 2y agoIt’s addictive if the state says it is, according to the state’s technical definition of “addictive” (personalized content, etc. - the bill has a detailed definition).