4 ms·
What's the definition of truly secure?
by irundebian 2y ago
What's the definition of truly secure?
- forgetfreeman 2y agoThe world economy is hemorrhaging over a trillion dollars USD annually to cybercrime, so however you choose to define it it clearly doesn't exist.
- irundebian 2y agoIf you defined it as absence of runtime errors, it exists.
- forgetfreeman 2y agoEven if that's true (massive if) it's a meaningless assertion. You've still got to deal with several tiers of hardware vulns, the OS space, and figure out a way to provably secure any network traffic generated. "hello world" tends to be pretty secure in theory but it isn't particularly useful.
- irundebian 2y agoIt's not meaningless because relevant security issue arise from runtime errors. These can be completly fixed by using Ada/SPARK or Rust. Hardware vulns are for many systems not very important.
- forgetfreeman 2y agoLOL The Rust Evangelism Taskforce has entered the chat
- irundebian 2y agoI don't use Rust. And you have no single argument.
- forgetfreeman 2y agopoints at the aforementioned forest fire of money You have a way to put that out all of the best funded companies on the planet and just about every sovereign government would be kicking your door in. That's my argument. Observed results trump hypotheticals.
- irundebian 2y agoThat does not make sense.
- forgetfreeman 2y agoI assure you it does.