3 ms·
I also use make this way and have done for years. I even have the same kind of religious ritual the author has, like writing the Makefile is part of setting up
by alex-moon 2y ago
I also use make this way and have done for years. I even have the same kind of religious ritual the author has, like writing the Makefile is part of setting up the codebase and organising in my own head how the whole local dev environment is going to work.
The only thing is, this isn't what make is actually for. A number of commenters have recommended Just - the one I've been using on my personal projects is Task - https://taskfile.dev/ https://taskfile.dev/ - which is pretty great. As other commenters have said, the problem is that make is installed everywhere already. I would love to see a task runner become standard to the same extent, and will have a look at Just if that's the one people are using.
- pletnes 2y agoThing is, make is not readily available on windows. It should’ve been in git bash, in my opinion, but just fills the gap in a cross-platform way
- jampekka 2y agoNo dev tools are readily available on Windows.
- metaltyphoon 2y agoOr macos
- droelf 2y agoPixi is native on Windows, can install a wide range of dev tools and has task running built into projects (alongside dependency management). https://pixi.sh/ https://pixi.sh/