4 ms·
Saying you disagree with my original comment might be inaccurate, seeing how it didn't touch on repeated bad faith; not that habitual lying would make any diffe
by GeoAtreides 2y ago
Saying you disagree with my original comment might be inaccurate, seeing how it didn't touch on repeated bad faith; not that habitual lying would make any difference to the validity of any argument (which depends only on being logical sound).
I do agree ignoring known and mercenary liars does save time.
- SuperNinKenDo 2y agoGiven the history of PwC and the Big 4, whether you specifically mention repeated bad faith or not, it's relevant to whether your analogy holds.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]