27 ms·
I do like "just" being suggested, but I strongly prefer using a very simple bash run script for tasks that do not require "make"'s extras, especially given that
by ac130kz 2y ago
I do like "just" being suggested, but I strongly prefer using a very simple bash run script for tasks that do not require "make"'s extras, especially given that most modern build tools do parallelism and artifact caching internally.
Inspired by:
https://github.com/adriancooney/Taskfile https://github.com/adriancooney/Taskfile
https://death.andgravity.com/run-sh https://death.andgravity.com/run-sh
- morningsam 2y agoI would theoretically prefer that as well, but it doesn't give you shell completion of targets/tasks for free like Make does. So for "UX parity", you'd also have to write a completion script and get users to source it into their shells somehow, which isn't great.