3 ms·
What a coincidence that accidents happen when you leave early. > the pollutes more argument doesn't hold up The amount of energy required to travel the same d
by tgv 2y ago
What a coincidence that accidents happen when you leave early.
> the pollutes more argument doesn't hold up
The amount of energy required to travel the same distance increases with speed. This effect, I believe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)#Power https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)#Power.
> The safest way to drive is maintain the flow of traffic and be predictable
True, in which case a radar detector is no use, but rather dangerous.
- bradleyy 2y ago> The amount of energy required to travel the same distance increases with speed. Power from engines is not linear. Volumetric efficiency (engines are air pumps!) is not linear. The efficiency of a transmission is not linear. The amount of energy required to travel the same distance is not linear to speed, at all. Go 1 MPH somewhere, you'll have terrible gas mileage. This is precisely the exact opposite of what you're describing.
- tgv 2y ago> The amount of energy required to travel the same distance is not linear to speed, at all. If it were linear, speed would have no effect on efficiency. > Power from engines ... But their efficiency can't improve with v^-3, so air friction wins. Just check the consumer reports on cars' fuel efficiency. Optimum efficiency is around 80km/h for most cars.