This author is writing about their frustration with their own inability to communicate effectively. They'd rather be verbose than concise to their own detriment

This author is writing about their frustration with their own inability to communicate effectively. They'd rather be verbose than concise to their own detriment. They have presented very sloppy logic throughout their tome of lamentation of being misunderstood. A commenter on the article does a much better job of getting to the point: > Prosperity follows energy – more energy more prosperity > > https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/energy-use-per-capita-vs-gdp-per-capita?yScale=log https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/energy-use-per-capita-vs-... > > 1. First people want more energy > > 2. Initially, dirty energy (wood, coal) is cheap and does promote prosperity > > 3. Then prosperity allows transition to clean energy: Nuclear, Hydro, Geothermal Oddly the commenter stops short of mentioning solar PV.