> I think your point of view is overlooking the concept of loophole or more precisely, malicious compliance. I don't think I am, because even if the cookie pop

> I think your point of view is overlooking the concept of loophole or more precisely, malicious compliance. I don't think I am, because even if the cookie popups were made with the genuine best intentions to adhere to the regulations, no malicious compliance at all, the people I am disagreeing with would still blame the corporations engaging in legal activity and not the regulations themselves that dictate the popups. I don't doubt malicious compliance exists or is a problem, but I don't think it makes much of a difference in this context.