3 ms·
Europe failed to keep its bureaucracy at bay. There were times in the 1990s when people like the Dutch commissioner Frits Bolkenstein sincerely tried to libera
by inglor_cz 2y ago
Europe failed to keep its bureaucracy at bay.
There were times in the 1990s when people like the Dutch commissioner Frits Bolkenstein sincerely tried to liberalize and open the internal market.
But at least since Brexit, possibly earlier, the EU has made a turn towards protectionism and closedness (at least economically; as you mention, it is way, way easier to ship people from Africa into the EU than bananas), a French attitude so to say.
Frankly, we the Czechs are missing Britain in the fold. It was a balancing power against the Franco-German attempts to micromanage and regulate absolutely anything. Together with NL and DK, they were a force for economic freedom within the Union.
BTW other nations are threatened by the very same development, see the shenanigans around FAA and their überlengthy process of licensing of space launches. But I am more optimistic about the US being able to cut red tape than the EU.
- WhereIsTheTruth 2y agoSomething tells me you are a brit living in CZ. Am I wrong?
- lispm 2y agoThe British voted for Brexit to enjoy poorer standards. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/09/englands-rivers-to-remain-in-poor-state-as-eu-laws-ignored-post-brexit-says-watchdog https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/09/... Good luck with removing "red tape".
- inglor_cz 2y agoBy putting red tape in scare quotes, do you want to express an opinion that every regulation is good and red tape is just a myth? More papers, more prosperity, without any limits or any inflection point?
- lispm 2y agoThe UK has argued for the Brexit with red tape removal, in practice this meant less protection. Standards are useful. To be outside a large population area of standardization and regulation only means, that nobody cares about your small-country standards and that the population gets the worst of both worlds: inferior local standards and very little influence in international standards.