4 ms·
More like no will. Does the domain/server implements required level? No? Block connection. Dtto email with automatic response. Is your IP in a botnet? Cut it
by mnau 2y ago
More like no will.
Does the domain/server implements required level? No? Block connection. Dtto email with automatic response.
Is your IP in a botnet? Cut it off.
Edit: I already get blocked connection (on target site) because EU regulation is too onerous. I get reminded on basically every Google search I am being censored (Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe).
Completely doable.
- GTP 2y ago> I already get blocked connection (on target site) because EU regulation is too onerous More like "we want to track every single user coming to our website without giving them the option to not be tracked".
- mnau 2y agoYou can serve consent form only to the connections from EU. I have been part of se several GDPR compliance projects and it's the other stuff that's the problem. Data protection officer (recurring cost, even though it is only a part of a job, not full time position) , user data deletion and user data take-out. Compliance is not free. If system wasn't designed from the beginning, it's really expensive to add it. Restore from backup after disaster recovery - make sure you anonymize/delete people who were deleted after backup was made. BTW, IP address is PII, so... Honestly, it would be cheaper to buy everyone in EU VPN.
- janc_ 2y agoIt's actually very simple & cheap to be compliant: stop tracking EU citizens.
- GTP 2y ago> You can serve consent form only to the connections from EU. Why? While I get that, if tracking is part of someone's business model, they want to track as many people as possible, I doubt it would be illegal to give also people that aren't in the EU the option to not be tracked. If it really would be so expensive to be compliant while also differentiating between users connecting from the EU and users connecting from outside the EU, why not just give everyone the option to choose if they want tracking as a measure to cut compliance cost?
- guappa 2y agoWhat do you suggest? Bomb even more countries?
- mnau 2y agoYou don't need to bomb anyone. Add IP rules at cables inside and out of let's say EU and block it there. Same way we deal with any non-compliance thing. You can't import it. Your server/domain doesn't satisfy requirments. Either the originator complies or not (e.g. through trusted third party).
- guappa 2y agoBecause ip geolocation has always been reliable and never inaccurate?
- mnau 2y agoNo geolocation is needed. And even if it was, these are technical problems, inherently solve able. So far, we are building walls and replacing mortar with a new one, while attackers bombard us with complete impunity. This is never going to work. This would of course need new extensions /protocols (even simplest would require authentication envelope around encrypted traffic).
- guappa 2y agoThe problem is that you think a societal problem can be solved technically.
- mnau 2y agoThe whole point is to move from technical solution (i.e. current approach) to legal one. Not a single response had anything to do with either problem ITA or my comment. I am not sure if you are troll, 10 y/o or gpt1, but have a nice day.
- 2y ago