4 ms·
Of course it’s .dng; .jxl doesn’t carry the metadata needed to process a RAW image because it’s not intended for that.
by brigade 2y ago
Of course it’s .dng; .jxl doesn’t carry the metadata needed to process a RAW image because it’s not intended for that.
- USiBqidmOOkAqRb 2y agoWhich metadata exactly? Is the actual concern that someone unaware might accidentally stumble on the unprocessed image?
- brigade 2y agoTo start with, without a linearization table, white and black levels, how exactly do you expect sensor data to be usefully interpreted?
- USiBqidmOOkAqRb 2y agoWell, I assumed Exif and embedded color profile would have been expressive enough for this. I do agree I'm a bit out of my depth when it comes to raw photo data but Exif seemed to have properties for everything, even counting the kitchen sinks in the image.
- appendix-rock 2y agoWhere did that come from? It feels like you’re working backwards from some bad feelings felt about Apple.
- illiac786 2y agoHmmm, is the jpeg xl data inside the dng not demosaicized?