3 ms·

You're thinking about the atom very classically, At the scale of the nucleus things just don't "exist" in "places". Processes are truly random and things liter

You're thinking about the atom very classically, At the scale of the nucleus things just don't "exist" in "places". Processes are truly random and things literally don't have position/momentum/rotation/alignment until you do the thing that requires them to decide where they were and what they were doing at the time. Simpler than nuclear physics is just the electron. There is no meaningful answer to where it is around an atom at any particular time. You can either get a location or a momentum or half the information about each if you poke it, but that's just its response to being poked, it wasn't "actually" there until you poked it.

im3w1l 2y ago
From what I recall, quantum things have well defined states, even if those states may not correspond to position / momentum / rotation / alignment. By correctly molding the energy landscape it may be possible to set the states and state transitions up in a beneficial way for what he proposed.
- colechristensen 2y ago
  Eh, not really. You can futz with the probability distribution, like a fast neutron will cause a different distribution of fission products than a slow one... but it is still a very random process. You can't control it like an expert at a billiards table. Especially the strong force mediated interactions between particles in the nucleus. Some people just won't believe you though.
fooker 2y ago
> Processes are truly random You can get a Nobel prize or two by proving this. We don't know about random yet, just that there's no hidden variable.
- rjprins 2y ago
  Some say that it has not been fully proved there are no hidden variables. https://youtu.be/ytyjgIyegDI?t=86 https://youtu.be/ytyjgIyegDI?t=86 (Sabine Hossenfelder on Superdeterminism)
steveoscaro 2y ago
The universe... just one big wave function perhaps
- avaldez_ 2y ago
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93DeWitt_equation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93DeWitt_equat...
arcbyte 2y ago
I'm a big believer in Energy Wave Theory.

im3w1l 2y ago

From what I recall, quantum things have well defined states, even if those states may not correspond to position / momentum / rotation / alignment. By correctly molding the energy landscape it may be possible to set the states and state transitions up in a beneficial way for what he proposed.

colechristensen 2y ago
Eh, not really. You can futz with the probability distribution, like a fast neutron will cause a different distribution of fission products than a slow one... but it is still a very random process. You can't control it like an expert at a billiards table. Especially the strong force mediated interactions between particles in the nucleus. Some people just won't believe you though.

fooker 2y ago

> Processes are truly random You can get a Nobel prize or two by proving this. We don't know about random yet, just that there's no hidden variable.

rjprins 2y ago
Some say that it has not been fully proved there are no hidden variables. https://youtu.be/ytyjgIyegDI?t=86 https://youtu.be/ytyjgIyegDI?t=86 (Sabine Hossenfelder on Superdeterminism)

steveoscaro 2y ago

The universe... just one big wave function perhaps

avaldez_ 2y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93DeWitt_equation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%E2%80%93DeWitt_equat...

arcbyte 2y ago

I'm a big believer in Energy Wave Theory.