Sorry, none of this is true. The search warrants were incorrect as I've already stated - using the search warrants as evidence is not evidence. Using an officer

Sorry, none of this is true. The search warrants were incorrect as I've already stated - using the search warrants as evidence is not evidence. Using an officer's word, or rather some random YouTuber's interpretation of their word, is also not evidence. If all the reputable sources are saying one thing, but fringe conservative minds on YouTube are saying another, it might be time to reconsider the validity of your position. > likely involved You're basing this on nothing, and "likely" means nothing to me. > funneling through that very house Wrong house, wrong warrant > Had any drugs or money not been moved out, we would even be having this conversation. Incorrect. Even if there were criminals present (there weren't), the punishment of crime is due process. Not state sanctioned execution. This is a human rights violation no matter how you cut it or how terrible you want to think the victims are. And that's really the whole crux and the crux of a lot of issues surrounding police brutality. It doesn't matter if there were drugs in this house at one point. It doesn't matter if Floyd was on fentanyl. It doesn't matter if Floyd really did counterfeit a twenty. It doesn't matter if Daniel Shaver really did have a bb gun. None of those have a punishment of public execution. Police brutality is brutality regardless of if the victims are criminals or not, and regardless of the criminals' race. Or their neighborhood. Or what your buddies in Louisville think of them.