5 ms·
Open Source doesn’t imply the absence of property rights. It’s a choice to invest my own effort into something I choose to give to some people for free. It li
by _yid9 2y ago
Open Source doesn’t imply the absence of property rights.
It’s a choice to invest my own effort into something I choose to give to some people for free.
It literally requires me to use (at personal risk) my savings to create and give a gift to others.
I don’t see “socialists” risking their own wealth to produce and give gifts to others. They take others wealth and give it to their (usually unproductive) friends.
Big difference.
- DonnyV 2y ago"I don’t see “socialists” risking their own wealth to produce and give gifts to others. They take others wealth and give it to their (usually unproductive) friends." Isn't that how hedge funds are ran, lol.
- Ancapistani 2y agoSort of. They use others' wealth, increase it, and take a cut of that increase. ... at least in theory :)