4 ms·
Note that both of those features use generics, which weren't present in the language before, so IMO Go just prefers to wait a bit before implementing useful fea
by nasretdinov 2y ago
Note that both of those features use generics, which weren't present in the language before, so IMO Go just prefers to wait a bit before implementing useful features instead of having too many of them (ahem, Swift?)
- pjmlp 2y agoThey use generics because they are available now, otherwise most likely they would be magic functions like before.