4 ms·
"no longer try to turn money into real innovation" because they can't. they've failed at every turn which is why they are in this predicament. They let a compan
by knowitnone 2y ago
"no longer try to turn money into real innovation"
because they can't. they've failed at every turn which is why they are in this predicament. They let a company with less resources, fewer engineers, no fab trounce them. It's like Intel hasn't done a thing for years and years when they were far ahead of the game. But CEO gets to walk away with MILLIONS while losing the company BILLIONS. If you ever wanted to look up the meaning of loser, look no further. And Pat is left to fix the mess. What's he got to work with? A bunch of losers.
- ClassyJacket 2y ago" They let a company with less resources, fewer engineers, no fab trounce them" Which company are you referring to?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- HDThoreaun 2y agoamd + nvidia + qualcomm too why not, I guess arm too
- _fs 2y agonot to mention losing the golden goose of the apple market
- jwineinger 2y agoASML?
- ac29 2y agoPresumably Apple or AMD. I disagree. Intel seems to be as good as either one at chip design, but they are hamstrung by behind behind in manufacturing. They haven't really struggled with performance, its performance per watt and cost that are their problems. Both of those are mostly fab issues. Lunar Lake, built on TSMC, looks really competitive. Both with Apple, and with AMD (though AMD has had constant struggles with shipping laptop chips to the point they aren't even seriously considered for large scale enterprise deployment).
- musicale 2y agoApple has a lot of resources (though traditionally less expertise in silicon.)