3 ms·
Good point against the EEE case above, but the models are not open source per the OSI definition that everyone understands. That part is part of their marketing
by yazzku 2y ago
Good point against the EEE case above, but the models are not open source per the OSI definition that everyone understands. That part is part of their marketing playbook. Licenses are almost always non-commercial use, which makes them not-open. You could say it's "open model", but that's a useless term since the arch is not a secret, but rather the training data that went into it, which is not open.