4 ms·
it's pretty absurd that cloudflare can just effectively cripple a cloud provider by tagging part of their IPv4 range as Iranian and not fixing their issues in o
by dathinab 2y ago
it's pretty absurd that cloudflare can just effectively cripple a cloud provider by tagging part of their IPv4 range as Iranian and not fixing their issues in over a year (and AFIK have no intention to fix them at all)
like I wonder if Hetzner has any way to legally force them to stop misclassifying their IP
- dools 2y agoKinda seems like it might have legs as a defamation lawsuit...
- amatecha 2y agoWhat's absurd to me is that Cloudflare gains more and more control over the internet, by people voluntarily submitting to its domination. My favorite is trying to go someone's random blog with like 5 posts (because they have a singular post about the technical topic I'm trying to figure something out about) and I can't access the site because Cloudflare has decided my locked-down Firefox ("resist fingerprinting" + strict privacy mode etc.) running on OpenBSD is somehow malicious. So much for the open web. (nevermind the audacity that "we can't spy on you sufficiently" is enough to serve a 403 Forbidden response header)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- literallycancer 2y agoMight have something to do with how that particular website is using Cloudflare.
- anonzzzies 2y agoIt is extremely hard to stop DDOS attacks without CF; my hoster has DDOS protection, but when there was a very large attack on our site, only CF could remedy it, and did so immediately when we panicked-moved dns and switched on bot fight. Entire attack that my hoster couldn't stop was gone. How do you do this without CF if you are a small company?
- johnklos 2y agoThere are *so* many options out there. Saying you don't know how to do it without using an evil, monopolistic company is like saying you can't host email without using Google. It's lazy, untechnical and just plain untrue.
- anonzzzies 2y agoEnlighten me please; I have asked many times and everyone keeps sending me to cloudflare, even some hosters. When you search for anything like this, it ends up being very expensive which is not lazy; we cannot afford it. Botfight is free. Maybe if people knew about alternatives, they would use CF less. I wouldn't use them at all (and don't; I switch when my hoster cannot handle the attack which happened once only).
- johnklos 2y agoI don't use them myself, but I only choose colocation providers that have a good handle on their own protections. A quick search, though, shows lots of reviews and options: https://www.techradar.com/news/best-ddos-protection https://www.techradar.com/news/best-ddos-protection https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/ddos-mitigation-solutions https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/ddos-mitigation-solut... https://expertinsights.com/insights/top-distributed-denial-of-service-ddos-defense-solutions/ https://expertinsights.com/insights/top-distributed-denial-o... No idea about the content of those links, but considering the amount of research I do before selecting a colo provider, it'd be trivial in comparison to research a DDoS protection service.
- anonzzzies 2y agoBut you didn't check those sites; they all recommend cloudflare or either very expensive (we all know what it means when there are no prices on the site and sales can call me) solutions, hard to use solutions or solutions you cannot use unless you are a certain type of site (the google one). So basically the choice is cloudflare if you are not cashed up enough. So nothing to do with lazy; there are no other viable options for most if it's a large attack.