3 ms·

Union-busting campaigns are extremely effective, and honestly labor unions have gotten very lazy about building new units. "Hot shop" focused organizing plus a

• Mountain_Skies 2y ago
  Just one person's experience but when I was younger, I worked for several years at both a non-union grocery store and a unionized store in different cities. Working union was much better but part of that was the quality of co-workers was better. At the non-union store, I can see why unionization on the surface would be unappealing since there were lots of low quality employees. If you're someone who does their assigned work and see other slacking off constantly and constantly screwing things up, hearing the typical union messages of solidarity isn't going to be appealing. You have to be able to view things in the context of unionization of the company also making the jobs more appealing to a better quality worker. In my n=1 opinion, the non-union chain lost lots of money through poor quality labor and might have been better off with high labor costs that would be offset by higher quality labor but I have no way of actually being able to quantify that to determine if it would be true. At both the union and non-union stores there was a perception that union dues were used by union officials more for their own enrichment than for the benefit of members. Having worked at the non-unionized store first, the better wages and benefits easily outweighed the cost of union dues, but some of that could also have been due to the location in a more affluent area.