2 ms·
[deleted]
by echelon 2y ago
[deleted]
- hyperpape 2y agoThis is not a particularly useful contribution. Source 1: Only mentions anonymous sources. And while I would put partial weight on that coming from an actual journalist, this is the same professor who wrote the original blogpost. Source 2: Same publication as Source 1, though I don't see a byline. No named sources. Source 3: No named sources. The "About Us" features Lorem Ipsum and four photos of the same woman. Source 4: A reddit post, no sources, and the amount quoted is not $600 million, but $250 million. Source 5: A petition. References an Oracle press release that didn't show up in your Google search (most likely because it doesn't exist, or it would be widely cited).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]