My issue with the "systemd violates the unix philosophy" argument is that it... doesn't. I see systemd-resolved touted as an example of this. systemd-resolved i

My issue with the "systemd violates the unix philosophy" argument is that it... doesn't. I see systemd-resolved touted as an example of this. systemd-resolved is a different tool to systemd; it does one thing and does it well. Might as well say GNU violates unix philosophy because it has text processors AND a shell.