3 ms·
OP reads like a lazy ripoff of earlier debates around Lumina, principally https://trevorklee.substack.com/p/please-dont-take-luminas-anticavity https://trevorkl
by gwern 2y ago
OP reads like a lazy ripoff of earlier debates around Lumina, principally https://trevorklee.substack.com/p/please-dont-take-luminas-anticavity https://trevorklee.substack.com/p/please-dont-take-luminas-a... , which I don't see acknowledged or linked at all.
- fnordpiglet 2y agoTo be fair I be fair I’ve seen many articles and source materials on the debate and most of it is based on an understanding of the current state of the science, which is available from primary sources and not just random substacks and blogs. I would feel totally comfortable writing one of these articles on Lumina myself without citing anything but primary research, which this article does do, and not citing anyone of the secondary sources of opinion I might have read along the way.