6 ms·
Alive, and used by practically no one.
by ghurlman 14y ago
Alive, and used by practically no one.
- pcwalton 14y agoHuh? SharePoint is used by 78% of the Fortune 500, according to Wikipedia...
- eli 14y agoSharePoint is absolutely dominating among US government agencies.
- riffraff 14y agoI lived in three countries in europe, and I've met people working on sharepoint in all three, so add another anecdotical evidence on this side of the pond too.
- arethuza 14y agoI suspect that ghurlman means that Microsoft SharePoint Workspace product (based on Groove) isn't as popular as the very succesful SharePoint server - I don't think the latter has much Groove-derived technology in it (although I could well be wrong).
- ghurlman 14y agoSharePoint Server and Groove only share enough code to make the Workspace product work.
- ghurlman 14y agoSharePoint is fine. A rather large portion of my income depends on it. SharePoint Workspace, which is what Groove became is never used, anywhere.
- InclinedPlane 14y agoIf only. Sharepoint may be an atrocity against good software, but it is heavily used in the industry. You would cry if you knew how much money MS makes off of it.
- modarts 14y agoCan you qualify your statement: "Sharepoint may be an atrocity against good software"? The product has actually improved a lot since the earlier versions that people usually associate their negative opinion of it with; and i've actually been seeing a lot more success stories than horror stories as of late with SharePoint 2010 deployments.
- InclinedPlane 14y agoWell, obviously it's a subjective opinion. I'll just say that my idea of good collaborative software is something a bit different than a pile of word docs hooked up to a web front-end and some other pages editable through a wysiwyg control that makes Frontpage 2000 look like a champ. But maybe that's just me. Obviously a lot of people find it useful. But to me I think it succeeds more due to the fact that it's an MS product and the extreme lack of robust competition in that space than it's due to any substantive positive qualities of sharepoint itself. Edit: fixed wysiwyg typo.
- dr42 14y agoWYSIWYG (not wisywig) [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG
- nl 14y agoI'm not the OP, but I have an opinion on this! It's true that Sharepoint 2010 is better than earlier versions. With this version the whole edit-file-in-sharepoint-using-word scenario works probably 95% of the time. That's a huge step forward over earlier versions. Of course, since the edit-file-in-sharepoint-using-word scenario is pretty much the only thing Sharepoint can do that still leaves it in the category of an atrocity against good software. (Yes, I realize that Sharepoint technically can do other things: wikis etc. If you've ever used any other good product in the same space you'll find the Sharepoint implementations laughable though).