3 ms·
If you're trying to learn Common Lisp, then no 'cl' is not sufficient. It ads a few CL features to Emacs lisp, but it isn't the same thing at all. If you're ju
by astine 14y ago
If you're trying to learn Common Lisp, then no 'cl' is not sufficient. It ads a few CL features to Emacs lisp, but it isn't the same thing at all.
If you're just trying to write Emacs extensions, then it's a nice extension to the language which makes it slightly more tolerable.