4 ms·
Why we should prefer the GR model, which lacks mapping from the model back to physical reality, over a physical explanation? It's clear that GR is wrong in case
by oneshtein 2y ago
Why we should prefer the GR model, which lacks mapping from the model back to physical reality, over a physical explanation? It's clear that GR is wrong in case of black hole, because mass CAN escape black holes[1], while GR says that nothing can escape black hole after crossing of event horizon, because of [internal implementation of their model] nonsense.
[1]: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/10/black-hole-burps-up-shredded-star-years-after-consuming-it/ https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/10/black-hole-bu...
- Vecr 2y agoInternal model implementations? You mean the speed of light?
- oneshtein 2y agoOpenGL can predict nice images about black holes. Thus, our Universe is just a frame buffer (array [x,y,z;t]), while gravitation is not a force but a shader. Sorry, our Universe is just a spacetime (array [x,y,z;t]), while gravitation is not a force but a curvature of spacetime.