3 ms·

> Remind me of where the best universities in the world are again? The places that do admissions solely on test scores? Or these “unfair” places that use more t

> Remind me of where the best universities in the world are again? The places that do admissions solely on test scores? Or these “unfair” places that use more than one metric? Maybe not the undergrad students, but grad students and many professors of research universities come from the countries where admissions are done solely on test scores. Having a big single exam that determines one's life outcome is bad on principle, but, it removes corruption, and is the most transparent method, ever.

noobermin 2y ago
It doesn't remove corruption. Here's an example of stealing positions in the gaokao in china: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3090774/chinas-gaokao-exam-fraud-victims-learn-worst-after-cheats-steal https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3090774/chin...
- __rito__ 2y ago
  That's an execution problem, not a principle problem. All humans are biased. Holistic admission has many more inherent flaws than test-score based admission.
carlmr 2y ago
>Having a big single exam that determines one's life outcome is bad on principle, but, it removes corruption, and is the most transparent method, ever. Couldn't we have multiple big exams and do some averaging? Maybe even take the median to discard outliers? This would keep the meritocratic fairness aspect and take the pressure from performing in one single exam determining your fate in life.
- __rito__ 2y ago
  These are ideas worth discussing. Many countries are moving away from ONE exam- once, or in a narrow time frame. For example, the research entry test, CSIR NET, in India is now taken twice a year, as opposed to once earlier, medicine entrance test did away with the age limit, and attempt limit. From this year, the final school exam at Senior year (12th standard) in my state becomes semester based, two tests- as opposed to one test once. What I absolutely despise is having metrics on the admission that are highly, highly skewed against the poors, like lifelong A's, school presidency, music performance, other co-curriculars, and so on. And the focus on increasing diversity at the cost of ability. I know many who could climb the socio economic ladder due to test based admission. And in significant numbers, not like the ~5 taken by Harvard in each meaningful program a year.
fhdsgbbcaA 2y ago
Those grad students are evaluated on far more than test scores, and the essays matter a ton. US university admissions are even more holistic at the graduate level. The candidates who have good test scores and nothing else get cut in the second round, it’s one of the easiest steps in doing the cull.
- kelipso 2y ago
  The essays are about the actual research they are interested in doing, it's more like a part of a technical interview. Unlike the tell me about your life, do you play lacrosse, bs that undergrad college applicants have to go through.
  - fhdsgbbcaA 2y ago
    There is always a personal statement and they matter.
    - kelipso 2y ago
      Depends on the department I guess. In my CS department, it's more like a job interview than some personal essay bs.

noobermin 2y ago

It doesn't remove corruption. Here's an example of stealing positions in the gaokao in china: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3090774/chinas-gaokao-exam-fraud-victims-learn-worst-after-cheats-steal https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3090774/chin...

__rito__ 2y ago
That's an execution problem, not a principle problem. All humans are biased. Holistic admission has many more inherent flaws than test-score based admission.

carlmr 2y ago

>Having a big single exam that determines one's life outcome is bad on principle, but, it removes corruption, and is the most transparent method, ever. Couldn't we have multiple big exams and do some averaging? Maybe even take the median to discard outliers? This would keep the meritocratic fairness aspect and take the pressure from performing in one single exam determining your fate in life.

__rito__ 2y ago
These are ideas worth discussing. Many countries are moving away from ONE exam- once, or in a narrow time frame. For example, the research entry test, CSIR NET, in India is now taken twice a year, as opposed to once earlier, medicine entrance test did away with the age limit, and attempt limit. From this year, the final school exam at Senior year (12th standard) in my state becomes semester based, two tests- as opposed to one test once. What I absolutely despise is having metrics on the admission that are highly, highly skewed against the poors, like lifelong A's, school presidency, music performance, other co-curriculars, and so on. And the focus on increasing diversity at the cost of ability. I know many who could climb the socio economic ladder due to test based admission. And in significant numbers, not like the ~5 taken by Harvard in each meaningful program a year.

fhdsgbbcaA 2y ago

Those grad students are evaluated on far more than test scores, and the essays matter a ton. US university admissions are even more holistic at the graduate level. The candidates who have good test scores and nothing else get cut in the second round, it’s one of the easiest steps in doing the cull.

kelipso 2y ago
The essays are about the actual research they are interested in doing, it's more like a part of a technical interview. Unlike the tell me about your life, do you play lacrosse, bs that undergrad college applicants have to go through.
- fhdsgbbcaA 2y ago
  There is always a personal statement and they matter.
  - kelipso 2y ago
    Depends on the department I guess. In my CS department, it's more like a job interview than some personal essay bs.