3 ms·

Please stop - selling our data to advertisers.

• o_m 2y ago
  For that to work users have to spend money on their services. I hope that will happen in the future, but until then it is hard to compete with free services that has ads.
  • troupo 2y ago
    You don't need invasive and pervasive tracking to display ads. Google became an ad behemoth with contextual ads
  • kalaksi 2y ago
    They probably still track you even if you paid money, so that makes paying less enticing. And it's prudent to assume so unless they clearly state otherwise
    • Ferret7446 2y ago
      That's because you're not paying enough. If you pay enough, you absolutely can get non-tracking products. Of course, people either aren't willing or can't. Them's the breaks.
      • latexr 2y ago
        The overwhelming majority of ad-supported services do not offer ad-free and surveillance-free alternatives. Heck, even plans literally named “no ads” can still show you ads. https://help.hulu.com/article/hulu-ads-no-commercials https://help.hulu.com/article/hulu-ads-no-commercials
      • kalaksi 2y ago
        You don't know what I'd pay. So can you name any popular services that offer that option? To add, there are estimations about how much ad money average user generates and it's very much affordable