Completely agree. Am luckily in a postition where my org is 100% remote (for the time being), and I am cherishing it for as long as it lasts. Many (most?) HN

Completely agree. Am luckily in a postition where my org is 100% remote (for the time being), and I am cherishing it for as long as it lasts. Many (most?) HN posts that discuss WFH seem to be from the POV of the employer/management, with topics such as: * ensuring employee vigilance * reducing employee wasted cycles (with the corner case provided often being workers with multiple side gigs) etc... (side note: seems like those comments are coming from temporarily-embarrased CEOs-in-waiting) OTOH, looks like reviews of WFH from the IC level are often pushed aside in HN, and it may show a skewed appreciation for the true popularity and benefits of WFH. While it may not be for everybody, for a great many of us, WFH is the best thing since sliced bread. And to have that removed for X reasons (whether legitimate or not) will incur a significant pain for those of us who have aligned to (what I consider) an optimal productivity lifestyle. Let that pain be heard, rather than pushed aside as invalid.