3 ms·
This was a bombing of military personnel by parties at war. That is, by definition, not terrorism. This action has been acceptable for as long as bombs have exi
by office_drone 2y ago
This was a bombing of military personnel by parties at war. That is, by definition, not terrorism. This action has been acceptable for as long as bombs have existed.
- irundebian 2y agoDepends on the definition, right?
- anigbrowl 2y agoIf the identities of the parties were reversed it would absolutely be labeled as terrorism.
- ericmcer 2y agoWill be interesting to see the ratio of civilian to military injuries was and if this is better or worse than something like a bunch of drone strikes or rocket strikes.
- daedrdev 2y agoThere were probably a bunch of civilian casualties, but I imagine most Hezbollah operative wear their pagers since their main purpose is to always receive messages, so it was probably a low percentage.