4 ms·
The real problem was they only "fact checked" one person when both told lies. You should really step out of your echo chamber. https://www.snopes.com/fact-che
by coolhand2120 2y ago
The real problem was they only "fact checked" one person when both told lies. You should really step out of your echo chamber.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
- Spivak 2y agoAnd they only fact-checked some of the lies of that one person, the blatantly obvious ones. You're complaining about fact-checking being biased and then citing fact-checking doing good work. Go read any analysis of the debate, the moderators let almost all the bullshit go unchecked. I think it says something different that with what was very light-touch moderation with the high-striker set higher than most viewers would have wanted Trump's bullshit rung the bell more than once.
- ZeroGravitas 2y agoThe real, real problem is that there's a candidate for President who can be predicted in advance to make the unfounded claim that immigrants are eating pet cats with such confidence that a response can be ready.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- marcusverus 2y agoTrump was just subject to a second assassination attempt. How do you figure Kamala's lie, which she and the moderators knew was a lie, which was intended specifically to demonize a man who had already been subject to one assassination attempt, was somehow a "less real" problem than a lie about a Haitian eating a cat?