3 ms·
Since folks seem to not recall prior articles about marissa mayer, I believe it's clearly mentioned elsewhere that she's one of those people who via medical acc
by carterschonwald 14y ago
Since folks seem to not recall prior articles about marissa mayer, I believe it's clearly mentioned elsewhere that she's one of those people who via medical accident/ virtue only need a substantially reduced amount of sleep compared with most people. The journalist for this article is clearly an idiot for neglecting that important contextual info.
That Is all.
- libria 14y agoThat is not all. If you're criticizing the author for omitting facts, it should go without saying you need to cite them.
- carterschonwald 14y agohttp://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/fortune/how_i_work/frameset.exclude.html http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/fortune/how_i_work/frameset... "My day starts around 9 A.M. and meetings finish up around 8 P.M. After that I stay in the office to do action items and e-mail. I can get by on four to six hours of sleep. I pace myself by taking a week-long vacation every four months." and thats just the first google result for "marissa mayer sleep"
- crusso 14y agoKind of an aside, but I find the requirement of providing proof in an argument to be pretty ambiguous in an age where Googling things is so darned easy. Sure, I could find a link that gives the quantum dynamics of why water is wet when I use that fact in an argument... but do I really need to? These days, it seems that pushing back on people to provide easily knowable supporting information is just a delaying tactic or cognitive dissonance coping method... as in "Oops, I just read a really uncomfortable conclusion... I think I'll ask for proof then close this window before it's actually provided." :)