3 ms·
To do that, dog should be handled by someone who is not their regular police handler. Then they would claim he doesn't know how to handle the dog properly, or d
by EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 2y ago
To do that, dog should be handled by someone who is not their regular police handler. Then they would claim he doesn't know how to handle the dog properly, or doesn't have the required "soul bond" with the animal. Can't win against crooks.
- krisoft 2y ago> To do that, dog should be handled by someone who is not their regular police handler. Not necessarily if the experiment is double blind. (Or tripple blind I guess because it is the dog, the handler and the on-site experimenter who are not aware of where the samples are hidden.) > Can't win against crooks. That is the bigger problem.
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 2y agoyou are right
- namaria 2y agoWow questioning policing methods gets you automatically labelled as 'crook'? How is the boot tasting this morning?
- trissi1996 2y agoIn my reading the parent comment is labeling police as crook's not the GP or anyone for criticizing.