> (...) but this does seem to be intended to sway voters. I don't know what point you tried to make. All discussions comparing candidates are intended to contr

> (...) but this does seem to be intended to sway voters. I don't know what point you tried to make. All discussions comparing candidates are intended to contribute to the decision-making processes followed by voters. What exactly do you think takes place in an election? I mean,the article leads with this observation: > Kamala Harris has plans to improve health, boost the economy and mitigate climate change. Donald Trump has threats and a dangerous record If you're deciding who to vote for, you're still undecided and those values are important to you personally, don't you think this information is decisive?