3 ms·
> just how intertwined the actual USofA and the actual Great Britain Foggy Bottom* has always been a part of Oceania? * pedantry: the actual State Dep't were
by 082349872349872 2y ago
> just how intertwined the actual USofA and the actual Great Britain
Foggy Bottom* has always been a part of Oceania?
* pedantry: the actual State Dep't were in Philadelphia at the time
Lagniappe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Influence_of_Sea_Power_upon_History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Influence_of_Sea_Power_upo...
EDIT: looking at en.wikipedia's entry for the results of the War of 1812, it offers pretty heavy evidence for your position:
- Anglo–American status quo ante bellum
- Spanish control over West Florida weakened and Mobile territory claimed
- Tecumseh's confederacy decisively defeated and dissolved
I think it strange to have a war that doesn't alter the positions of the principals, but does allow them to take a few third parties off the board; on the other hand that just may be my naivete.
- 082349872349872 2y ago> in the use of their navy Come to think of it, the causus belli of 1812 was Royal Navy impressment of US sailors: I can easily imagine some Sir "stick close to your desks and never go to sea" Joseph being surprised and wondering why the americans had been so confused as to miss the main point: providing manpower for Britannia's rule of the waves was in their own best interests, after all.