4 ms·
> to their own Graviton For open source software loads. If you're running licensed software in the cloud you don't often get to make this choice.
by akira2501 2y ago
> to their own Graviton
For open source software loads. If you're running licensed software in the cloud you don't often get to make this choice.
- dh2022 2y agoWould you mind expanding on this? Why would I not be able to run Oracle or SQL server on Graviton? Than you !
- jiggawatts 2y agoThere are no ARM builds of Microsoft SQL Server. Even if Microsoft does release such as thing, enterprise software lives in an ecosystem of thousands of third-party vendors that provide components that are often co-installed on the same box. Also, products like MSSQL are licensed per CPU core, so you want the fastest possible cores, not the cheapest. Currently that's the AMD EPYC X86-compatible CPUs, which run rings around everything else.
- electronbeam 2y agoThe examples you gave are commonly available proprietary software, but it’s really the long tail of low volume software where the author will only support really specific configurations
- ZiiS 2y agoOracle charge per core; whilst Graviton has a lot of advantages, you can get a bit more out of a single amd64 core. SQL server doesn't even release for ARM AFAIK.