> It isn't an open development, It is literally open development. There isn't a CLA and they accept patches/PRs from the community. The "least open" aspect is

> It isn't an open development, It is literally open development. There isn't a CLA and they accept patches/PRs from the community. The "least open" aspect is their contribution guidelines which are essentially just "the maintainer is not required to waste time on low quality PRs and reserves a right to veto PRs that move counter to the vision they have for the project". If that's not open development then neither is Linux or Git. > it isn't open data. And how is it not open data? The data is literally self-hostable, the relays and API servers are self hostable. And you can choose between an in-progress ID standard and a DNS based DID standard. There is literally no part of the data that isn't open.