3 ms·
> It makes sense if one considers the angle of how single-key shortcuts are much more disaster-prone. > ... > Most Mac shortcuts seem to follow this, with tho
by tivert 2y ago
> It makes sense if one considers the angle of how single-key shortcuts are much more disaster-prone.
> ...
> Most Mac shortcuts seem to follow this, with those that are single-key by default doing relatively harmless and easily reversible things.
The enter-to-rename behavior has been in Mac OS since near the beginning, when versions were just named something like "System N.M").
IIRC, I've heard they had very detailed UI design documents back then, that explained their choices (e.g. I've heard they explained the reason for the menu bar being at the top of the screen rather than the top of a window was the cursor will just stop there, requiring less mousing precision).
So if that's the case, there should be documents confirming or denying your speculation.
- int_19h 2y agohttp://interface.free.fr/Archives/Apple_HIGuidelines.pdf http://interface.free.fr/Archives/Apple_HIGuidelines.pdf (you can compare to the current ones and similar docs for other platforms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_interface_guidelines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_interface_guidelines)