5 ms·
(Shameless plug) If you're looking to go away from Qt, you can check out Slint https://slint.dev https://slint.dev Being inspired from QML, Qt users should feel
by ogoffart 2y ago
(Shameless plug) If you're looking to go away from Qt, you can check out Slint https://slint.dev https://slint.dev
Being inspired from QML, Qt users should feel at ease.
The license model is hopefully less constraining than the Qt one.
- duped 2y agoI played around with it for awhile but the generated code was awful for compile times. Have you looked into writing a proper interpreter instead of compiling to Rust, or optimizing the generated code for compile times?
- ogoffart 2y agoYes, we'd like to improve on that: https://github.com/slint-ui/slint/issues/4128 https://github.com/slint-ui/slint/issues/4128
- bb88 2y agoGPLv3 only. Qt at least has an LGPL option. So it seems more constraining.
- ogoffart 2y agoThere are 3 license: 1. GPL 2. Royalty-free (free of charge for desktop) 3. Paid license (which we hope is less constraining than the Qt commercial one)
- drpossum 2y agoThat's a lot more than "seems" if it's GPL. That is "you need to release your source code entirely under GPL if you even link to this"
- Brian_K_White 2y agoThe horror! Well not true anyway so don't wet yourself.
- kelnos 2y agoI think GP's point was that slint's commercial licensing is less of a minefield than Qt's, and the terms are straightforward and reasonable. (I haven't verified this; this is just how I read the GP's comment.)