Yeah, that’s nuts and is obviously flawed behaviour that can interact poorly with any number of things - not least of all any kind of checksums within the respo

Yeah, that’s nuts and is obviously flawed behaviour that can interact poorly with any number of things - not least of all any kind of checksums within the response. I’m surprised to see that in a RFC. Edit: it’s only for the cache key: > Note that any such normalization is performed solely for the purpose of generating a cache key; it does not change the request itself. Still super dangerous. Edit edit: I just typed out a long message on the GitHub issue tracker for this, but submitting it errored and I’ve lost all the content. Urgh