You're right it's ambiguous. It's a playful reference to a piece of literature. It's also quite an old terminology which is not going to change. If we could c

You're right it's ambiguous. It's a playful reference to a piece of literature. It's also quite an old terminology which is not going to change. If we could come up with a new terminology from the start we could find better options. For example: * Least/Most Significant First (LSF / MSF) * Low/High Address Least Significant (LALS/HALS) Etc