Agreed. To elaborate, he talks about self-identification, that anything with AI should be required to be labeled as such. And that enforcement is similar to how

Agreed. To elaborate, he talks about self-identification, that anything with AI should be required to be labeled as such. And that enforcement is similar to how globally governments chase down counterfeiters of money. It’s a good reference, in times where regulation is weak and easily circumvented – that hard lines and perseverance to maintain control at a global scale is still possible. Weapons and export controls are somewhat in a similar category. You still can’t build recreational nukes. Still, would that actually happen? As usual with safety, rules are (only) written in blood. To most politicians, I suspect these ideas are indistinguishable from the constant chatter of doomsday cults and alarmists. Without a major disaster resulting in loss of life, war, famine, I doubt anything’s gonna happen. Even a global IT outage is forgotten after 2 weeks, and after Covid we’re pretty desensitized.