4 ms·
> You may not find it appealing, but the truth is that most major successes are driven by obsession. Great, don't force it on your employees. I am not working
by darby_nine 2y ago
> You may not find it appealing, but the truth is that most major successes are driven by obsession.
Great, don't force it on your employees. I am not working for you for anything other than a paycheck and flexible working conditions and stimulating work.
- humanizersequel 2y agoNobody is forcing you to work for Mr Beast
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- darby_nine 2y ago> Nobody is forcing you to work for Mr Beast No, being unemployed is the coercive factor here. It's not fair to treat at-will employment as non-coercive unless non-employment is actually zero. Non-employment currently stands at about 7.7%: https://www.richmondfed.org/research/national_economy/non_employment_index https://www.richmondfed.org/research/national_economy/non_em... Why would anyone turn down a chance to make a living if a job is offered? Why do you think the fed ensures that there are never enough jobs for everyone? Why do you think the fed and the business world talks about the economy in terms of "jobs" and "unemployment" when these are metrics largely unrelated to stuff like "am I actually getting a fair wage" and "is housing priced anywhere near rationally"? etc—the non-coercive labor market is a complete illusion.