4 ms·
In your hypothetical scenario this is a potential problem regardless if you make static content or not. At least the static content is potentially less resourc
by azemetre 2y ago
In your hypothetical scenario this is a potential problem regardless if you make static content or not.
At least the static content is potentially less resource heavy but I don’t see how your concerns don’t apply to any online service.
- throwaway48540 2y agoPutting it on a $10 VPS means it costs $10 whatever happens. How to limit spend like this on static storage providers?
- azemetre 2y agoah I misread it, thanks for clarifying what they were trying to say.
- SahAssar 2y agoYou can host somewhere where it is mainly limited by bandwidth instead of traffic. So something like a hetzner dedicated server wouldn't be impacted by this (it's 1GB/s unlimited). The worst that can happen is that your site is sluggish or that hetzner takes it offline due to excessive usage (but I've only heard that happen when you use the full bandwidth for weeks and it is your fault). Plenty other providers have similar offers, its not a given that you pay by traffic.