3 ms·
> I wouldn't call o1 a "system". It's a model, but unlike previous models, it's trained to generate a very long chain of thought before returning a final answer
by nell 2y ago
> I wouldn't call o1 a "system". It's a model, but unlike previous models, it's trained to generate a very long chain of thought before returning a final answer
https://x.com/polynoamial/status/1834641202215297487 https://x.com/polynoamial/status/1834641202215297487
- astrange 2y agoThat answer seems to conflict with "in the future we'd like to give users more control over the thinking time". I've gotten mini to think harder by asking it to, but it didn't make a better answer. Though now I've run out of usage limits for both of them so can't try any more…
- qeternity 2y agoI'm not convinced there isn't more going on behind the scenes but influencing test-time compute via prompt is a pretty universal capability.
- whimsicalism 2y agonot in a way that it is effectively used - in real life all of the papers using CoT compare against a weak baseline and the benefits level off extremely quickly. nobody except for recent deepmind research has shown test time scaling like o1
- bratwurst3000 2y agoi am telling claude to give me not the obvious answer. that put thinking time up and the quality of answers is better. hope it helps.