5 ms·
Not sure I'm totally understanding here, but it sounds like LinkedIn turned on (probably AI-based) porn scanning on messages, there was a false positive, and th
by 13of40 2y ago
Not sure I'm totally understanding here, but it sounds like LinkedIn turned on (probably AI-based) porn scanning on messages, there was a false positive, and the guy wasn't able to escalate to support. Is there an implication that it was blocked for political reasons?
- MuffinFlavored 2y agoPeople send each other porn on LinkedIn?
- BadHumans 2y agoIf a program has a messaging system, it will be used to send porn.
- chillfox 2y agoBased on the number of guys who think LinkedIn is a dating site I don't see why there wouldn't be people who think it's a porn sharing site.
- inemesitaffia 2y agoEvery site that allows commutations will be used as a dating site. Sometimes you might be identified on the site and then communicated with on another channel.
- lazide 2y agoThe only thing not used as a dating site is dating sites. Those are for prostitution. (Somewhat /s)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- makeitdouble 2y agoActually, why wouldn't people working in porn and porn adjacent industries send porn related content to each other in DMs, totally in a professional context ?
- bigiain 2y agoWhat on earth makes you think people working in porn and porn adjacent industries behave "in a professional context" on LinkedIn, when nobody else seems to?
- pessimizer 2y agoWhat does this even mean?
- wisenull 2y agoI believe it was a joke. Nobody acts professionally on LinkedIn, therefore why would that industry stay on topic?
- lazide 2y agoPorn is bad, and clearly they should feel bad. (/s, but that is the way these things tend to go longer term!)
- fknorangesite 2y ago> send each other I imagine it's a lot more uni-directional. Where there is a messaging platform, there are unsolicited dick pics.
- duskwuff 2y agoGiven how many people are on LinkedIn, would you doubt that women on the platform sometimes get sexually harassed in DMs, e.g. by people sending them porn?
- totetsu 2y agoIt’s not porn, it’s mixed use technology. The persons decentralized LORA radio messaging platform, is another persons disaster resilience platform, is another persons hobby project, is another persons anti censorship tool, is another persons improvised frontline communications tool, is another persons counter-terrorism ai ban hammer trigger.
- kybernetyk 2y ago>It’s not porn, it’s mixed use technology. Edge/edging ... of course it's a porn flag.
- bbor 2y agoWOW that's the reason? I didn't catch that, that's both hilarious and disheartening. Dijkstra is rolling in his grave... I suppose we'll have to move from "nodes and edges" to, idk, "dots and lines", kinda like TikTok has created "unalive"?
- romwell 2y agoCan't wait to see what the almighty AI thinks about the Tits problem![1] Or the Tits group[2] (I swear, I'm not a member!). Very tempted to include Tits Alternative[3] as one of my interests on LinkedIn, but I'm afraid the result will be too predictable. Side note: The two groups that don't satisfy the Tits Alternative are very dear to my heart. Writing software to do computation in Thompson's Group and its generalizations[4] was my introduction to geometric group theory. And I ended up with Grigorchuk as my graduate advisor after learning about the Grigorchuk group. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kneser%E2%80%93Tits_conjecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kneser%E2%80%93Tits_conjecture [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_group https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_group [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_alternative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_alternative [4] https://github.com/romwell/nvTrees https://github.com/romwell/nvTrees
- deskr 2y agoOr copper nanotubes. The classic nanotubes are made from carbon (C), called CNTs. The copper (Cu) are called CuNTs. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-013-5387-8 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-013-5387-8