4 ms·
It sounds like you are describing Winamp 2. As I recall (and the article seems to confirm) Winamp 3 added no useful features while killing stability and speed.
by spectre256 14y ago
It sounds like you are describing Winamp 2. As I recall (and the article seems to confirm) Winamp 3 added no useful features while killing stability and speed. I do remember liking winamp 5 (there was no 4) though.
- masklinn 14y ago> As I recall (and the article seems to confirm) Winamp 3 added no useful features while killing stability and speed. Aye. It added deeper skinning support, but was slow, crash-prone and incompatible with everything built for winamp 2. Winamp 5 was built on the Winamp 2 codebase with some Winamp 3 techs in (such as "modern skins")