4 ms·
Followup to “Not as SPDY as You Thought”
- newman314 14y agoIs the site down?
- tav 14y agoSeems to be down here too :( Google cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.belshe.com/2012/06/24/followup-to-not-as-spdy-as-you-thought/&hl=en&prmd=imvns&strip=1 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.bel...
- perlgeek 14y agoSeems it's just not as speedy as you thought... :-)
- josteink 14y agoBasically the whole post can be summed up via these choice quotes: Overall, I disagree with his title, but I don’t disagree with his results ... his methodology, it’s mostly fine Guy tested partial SPDY page loads, not full SPDY page loads. More specifically, he tested this case: if you upgrade your primary domain, but few of your other domains, your CDN, etc, how does SPDY perform? (followed up with a table showing that this is a very realistic test scenario)
- felixc 14y agoWell, not entirely. He also explained that the original test counted sub-domains that the primary page owner also controls as non-upgraded third-party ones, whereas someone performing a SPDY roll-out would most likely also upgrade them. The table then showed exactly how many resources that were counted as "non-upgradeable" were in fact most likely upgradeable (most or even almost all of them).