Discreteness doesn't imply there is no relation in the sequence. For instance, consider a processor in a robot processing sensations at clock cycle speed. The

Discreteness doesn't imply there is no relation in the sequence. For instance, consider a processor in a robot processing sensations at clock cycle speed. The memory chip or processor cores or software cant be used as a basis for unity, because a relation between successive elements of the sequence is not the same as there being an underlying unity as all parts can be individually swapped out in upgrades (like in the Ship of Theseus). Buddhist vipassana descriptions use the analogy of seeing a line of ants - From afar, they look like a single black line, but on going nearby one sees the discrete nature. Similarly, on becoming adept at mind noting practice, one can see thoughts/sensations this way. (Not saying that I agree with the above take, as I do think there is an underlying consciouness which gives unity, but here I am attempting to steelman the argument. Also, as you indicate, the original article is talking about a different aspect - unity at a single time vs unity across moments, and a discussion of how reflection alters the contents of consciousness.)